Kris finally talked me into it. I loaded up my account quickly using the importer and my physical books entered at LibraryThing (those that had ISBNs anyway) and a list of my ebooks that I managed to figure out how to get Calibre to spit out for me (again, those with ISBNs). Between those and the account set up pages of "oh, you like this genre, have you read any of these?" which went on for ages I have a lot of books in there, and I know I'll probably be expanding that when I visit my family and browse the shelves there to remind me of all the books I've read and forgotten.
Before we get to my first review on the site (which is not impressive as reviews go, I'm not much for detail) here's a run down of the Goodreads rating system:
★☆☆☆☆ 1 star "I didn't like it"
★★☆☆☆ 2 stars "It was okay"
★★★☆☆ 3 stars "I liked it"
★★★★☆ 4 stars "I really liked it"
★★★★★ 5 stars "It was amazing"
As a result of this system most of what I read and like ends up with 3 stars. Things I re-read generally end up with 4, and only a very few things get 5 stars. So don't think a 3 star rating from me means it's a bad or even "just mediocre" story, it's something I liked but probably won't re-read any time soon.
The Chinese Maze Murders: A Judge Dee Mystery by Robert van Gulik
My rating: 3 of 5 stars
Unlike modern western mysteries where the detective has one case to solve in the course of the story, Judge Dee solves several, mostly unrelated, cases. As a result the feel of the story is more "slice of life" than "dramatic event", which I enjoyed.
Potential readers should be aware that the story does reflect the culture of the times, both that of the writer and that of Judge Dee. There is a lot of casual violence in the day to day life of the characters, torture is a valid way to obtain confessions, and any executions will be detailed at the end. The violence is not glorified, it's just what happens, but if someone is flayed until their bones are exposed you will know it.
View all my reviews
Before we get to my first review on the site (which is not impressive as reviews go, I'm not much for detail) here's a run down of the Goodreads rating system:
★☆☆☆☆ 1 star "I didn't like it"
★★☆☆☆ 2 stars "It was okay"
★★★☆☆ 3 stars "I liked it"
★★★★☆ 4 stars "I really liked it"
★★★★★ 5 stars "It was amazing"
As a result of this system most of what I read and like ends up with 3 stars. Things I re-read generally end up with 4, and only a very few things get 5 stars. So don't think a 3 star rating from me means it's a bad or even "just mediocre" story, it's something I liked but probably won't re-read any time soon.

My rating: 3 of 5 stars
Unlike modern western mysteries where the detective has one case to solve in the course of the story, Judge Dee solves several, mostly unrelated, cases. As a result the feel of the story is more "slice of life" than "dramatic event", which I enjoyed.
Potential readers should be aware that the story does reflect the culture of the times, both that of the writer and that of Judge Dee. There is a lot of casual violence in the day to day life of the characters, torture is a valid way to obtain confessions, and any executions will be detailed at the end. The violence is not glorified, it's just what happens, but if someone is flayed until their bones are exposed you will know it.
View all my reviews